3rd Edition Spoilers

[sim]

Also wenn diese Karten wirklich alle so gedruckt werden (und selbst wenn nicht, die Starter sind schon übertrieben!), dann finde ich das alles viel zu übertrieben. Klar, neues Base-Set und so, aber diese Karten sind fast alle besser als alles was davor war! Zumindest kommts mir so vor. Und das alles in einem Set, dessen Starter Karten enthalten, für die man früher 20/30 Dollar zahlen musste... ich sag nur: Verkehrte-Welt-Effekt

[hardyrange]

Die hier sind echt krass:

Gurchon Hall". 3 pool. Master: unique Location. Requires a ready cardinal. Hunting ground. During your untap phase, you may move 1 blood from the blood bank to each of the two ready oldest vampires you control. A vamp can only gain 1/hunting ground per turn.

Um die Krassheit zu mildern, hier noch eine Clarification dazu:

From: LSJ
Date: Wed, Sep 13 2006 3:13 am
Email: "LSJ" <vtes...@white-wolf.com>
Groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad

Jozxyqk wrote:
> Text from Gurchon Hall:
> ====
> Master: unique location. Requires a ready cardinal. Hunting ground.
> During your untap phase, you may move 1 blood from the blood bank to
> each of the two oldest ready vampires you control. A vampire can gain
> blood from only one hunting ground card each turn.
> ====

> First, a curiosity:
> Although the rulebook is clear that Regents count as Cardinals for
> all purposes, LSJ seems to have gone out of his way with the reprint
> cards to add "cardinal or regent" where they used to say cardinal.
> Any particular reason why this one doesn't say "cardinal or regent"?

I can't think of any.

> Second, a question (the obvious question, I think):
> What if I only control one vampire?

> Does that 1 vampire gain 1 blood? (probably)
> Does that 1 vampire gain no blood? (I do not control 2 vampires)

This, by the rule on targeting.
If you don't have suitable targets, you cannot invoke the effect.


> Does that 1 vampire gain 2 blood? (he's the oldest and the second-oldest;
> the least likely answer)