Page 1 of 1

Bochum: 'Report' of Utrecht 29.02.04

Posted: 01 Mar 2004, 12:21
by Tobias
At the request of some people, a tournament story from me. Now, this is a re-write of a post I made to the newsgroup in a thread about dealmaking, so it's a little different from normal. Also, I've forgotten many Dutch and German names yesterday - my apologies to everyone, I think you're all wonderfull people, but you know that anyway. ;)

Decklist at the end.

So:

Yesterday, I went totally against the grain of deal-keeping (partially motivated by Derek's eloquent defense of bastardly behaviour) and manipulated and lied to my heart's content.

I played weenie potence with a sprinkling of dominate.

Round 1:

Me -> Arvid (Lasombra political) -> Emiliano (Gangrel wall) -> Hardy (Giovanni powerbleed) -> X1 (Anson Masterdeck)

In round 1, I got my prey low on pool (and minions) over and over, but minion tap, superior govern and golconda's kept him in the game so long that I only managed to oust him really late, then dying to the fully tooled-up gangrel deck. (It helped that the Giovanni power-bleed, that had become my predator after ousting Anson & his protected resourced with ease, didn't cycle into bleed modifiers for a few turns. If he had, the table would've probably been his.) So just 1 VP for me, 1 to Hardy, 3 to Emiliano.

Table 2:

Me -> Dieter (!Malk/AR) -> X2 (Giovanni powerbleed) -> X3 (Giovanni powerbleed)

And me packing only 5 deflections. :)

I told the giovanni´s I was also playing a giovanni deck (well, sort of), so I wanted to talk about influencing. The reason: I had Isabel in the opening crypt (and some other giovanni that don't belong in powerbleed decks), so I wanted to pretend I was 'giving' something away by not influencing certain minions. I did put 1 pool on isabel at some early point so that I could immediately contest her when my predator put her into play.

Anyways, contesting (of Isabel, and at a crucial moment of the secure haven on Dieter's vampire) and a litte cross-table spite between Dieter and my predator made it clear that the endgame would be between me and my crosstable 'buddy'. In the end, I cycled to my bleed modifiers one action to late, and was ousted. Again, only 1 VP, and the familiar frustration of 'so close'. 3 VP to X2.

Round 3:

Me -> X4 (Beast/Kendrick) -> X5 (Tzimi) -> Izaak (Ventrue obf vote)

When round 3 came up, and it was ANOTHER 4 player table, I knew I had to sweep or not be in the final (28 player tournament, IIRC). I went full-bore into famous beast with my guys, and knocked him to torpor quickly. However, my prey got Kendrick back out, and my predator also had votes I could do nothing about - and 2nd/obedience defense against my droogs.

My prey (correctly) called me the table threat (since I was going to oust him), and was working together with my predator to call 2-2 split KRCs on my and my crosstable buddy. With no chance to survive that if it continued too long (my predator had gotten me low, but a mis-played vote really saved my day), I looked over to my buddy and said "if you'll let me oust my prey and defend me a bit, I'll help you oust your prey and then we'll fight out the 1-on-1". Two very 'normal' alliances were thus formed, and I managed to oust my prey when I was at 1 pool. Then I started rushing my predator like the good boy I promised to be, but I couldn't really dent him. My new prey's turn was fairly inactive, and the next moments were spent by him defending against my predator's actions (I'm not sure any more if this took 1 or 2 turns). Any way, my predator's movement against me was hampered, but I noticed my prey running out of the reaction and defensive cards he was using to stop my predator. So, with both my prey and predator low on pool like me, I decided to be the bastard and started bleeding forward with my horde of guys, catching him with a dom-boosted bleed and ousting him - after which the game was effectively over.

1 GW, 6 VP wound up being enough for 3rd place in the finals. The first 2 decks down were Ravnos and Tzimisce (a different one from my third round). Knowing that Luc (a somewhat known quantity) was playing the Ravnos and an unknown player the Tzimisce, and that being the predator of Tzimisce could be a good 'road to pain', I decided to sit as predator to Luc/Ravnos. But, when placing my vampire, I didn't place a random potence weenie - I placed Isabel Giovanni, thus shouting 'Giovanni powerbleed' to the table. Jochem, whose deck was "1 starring blocker with support" decided that being the prey of that deck would be a 'bad thing', so sat as my predator. Wouter, 1st seeded with his presence/aabbt/anarch deck knew he was in for a lousy final - too much intercept on the table, and my rush could kill his minions. In the end he sat as my prey, which was a tough place to be, but not illogical - the Tzimi and Jochem's deck were guaranteed to pack too much intercept, so he'd never get a vote off, and at least I had no intercept (and Luc proved to have not so much either, but I don't know if Wouter knew what type of Ravnos Luc was playing).

So:

Me -> Wouter (presence anarch vote) -> Luc (Ravnos) -> X6 (Tzimi wall/Fiendish) -> Jochem (Aus/Cel block with guns)

I went full-tilt into Wouter (who only had Jost and 1 Aabbt in the whole game, and Jost took only 4 actions, 1 being a self-rescue) and was set to easily oust him, when wouter got out - Aranthebes. With so few minions to torporise (Jochem had played a Tension in the Ranks), and Famed minions being eaten, and NOT drawing much dominate bleed boost not my 5-cap minions) I was effectively set into park due to that. Luc had 0 pressure and was hurting my cross-table tzimi buddy, the tzimi had previously hurt Jochem, who had to fight defensively (and all those frisbees I was discarding must've been discomforting to his sniper-rifle toting minions). Then came the second bastardly action: I needed to deal to get rid of Aranthebes, or Luc would be sweeping the table. I'm not sure if the Tzimi came up with it or I did, but he suggested removing the Aranthebes for me, if I would rush Luc's minions. Wouter was at 3 pool at that time, and there were no voting decks (although you never know if a surprise dramatic will come along), so I could've taken that deal very well. So I took it, and he removed the aranthebes. As a thank you, I kept the first part of our deal - I rescued a Tzimisce from torpor. Then I sent a probe bleed for 1 into wouter. That was ok. When I sent the second one, Luc woke with freshness and played an ignis fatuus (iirc) to reduce that bleed to 0. Damn. That meant I'd have to bleed with my other 2 minions to oust wouter immediately, if I wanted the VP and the oust right away, so no rush of Luc was possible. Since I had only 1 rush against the Ravnos
anyway, and with uncertain use of that rush (since Luc had many minions, mirror images, stealth, and his prey was at 1 pool it was hard to predict if the tzimi wall-ness would be totally sufficient, barely sufficient, or without a prayer) I decided to take the certain thing, break the deal, and bled wouter out, thus having no more rush on Luc. Another consideration was that I'd be much better able to fight against the ravnos and jochem's deck (at that point) than against a Tzimi. The danger was in Luc getting the table from that point. So Luc indeed ousted the Tzimi, and that player was rightfully pissed at me. After that both luc and I were in the driver's seats, and it could've gone both ways (certainly because Week of Nightmares would've been very effective at that point), but luc didn't get through Jochem very well and spent some of his gained pool on another minion, at which point it became clear I could offer a 2nd-place deal to Jochem and take 1st myself - and thus the second deal that 'made' the game for me was set. I ousted Luc after a while, and Jochem was allowed to withdraw for his 2nd place (since he was seeded higher than Luc).

I got 3 VP, 1 to Jochem, 1 to Luc.

So breaking deals and talking up deals a lot from me. And that with me complaining of the amount of talk in the Belgian ECQ last year...

The interesting question to me, at this point (and the whole reason for the long post), is: what has this done to my reputation? The tzimi I screwed in Round 3 I had not played against before, so he'll be wary of me - and he'll inform others about me. The tzimi I screwed in the final was a German lad I hadn't played against before (sorry for the name thing, again), and he'd be right to take tales of my evilness back to his playgroup as well. No hard feelings, I hope? (The Germans must have a different picture of me than the Belgians and the Dutch folk do. The Belgians and Dutch folk know I got absolute crap results from 2000 to 2003 in all tournaments - however, in 2003, things got better - and I started travelling to germany for the first time around that time).

Anyway, it was very much to play with everyone again, as always. I'll rub Dietmar's belly again for luck the next time I see him. Hope to be coming over to Germany soon, and hope to be organising a tournament again soon.

Deck Name: Serial Killer (VNV)
Created By: Tobias
Description:
"I know it's right and I know it's time for freedom:
to kill another and to kill another child of the flag
'till there are none left...
to kill another and to kill another
Gaze in horror at what you've become
and take a look at what you've done. "

Crypt: (12 cards, Min: 9, Max: 19, Avg: 3,50)
---------------------------------------------
1 Arnold Simpson pot 2, Brujah:3
1 Paul DiCarlo pot 2, Giovanni:2
1 Cristofero Giovanni nec pot 3, Giovanni:2
1 Mario Giovanni nec pot 3, Giovanni:2
1 Cameron dom pot 3, Lasombra:2
1 Chas Giovanni Tello DOM POT 4, Giovanni:2
1 Banjoko obt pot DOM 5, Lasombra:3
1 Wah Chun-Yuen cel dom pre POT 5, Brujah antitribu:3
1 Isabel Giovanni DOM NEC pot 5, Giovanni:2
1 Hugo POT pre vic 4, Brujah Antitribu:2
1 Agatha obf POT 4, Nosferatu Antitribu:2
1 Mitchell obt pot 2, Pander:2

Library: (90 cards)
-------------------
Master (13 cards)
1 Anarch Troublemaker
1 Barrens, The
2 Blood Doll
3 Fame
2 Haven Uncovered
1 Morgue Hunting Ground
3 Potence

Action (20 cards)
8 Bum's Rush
5 Computer Hacking
4 Govern the Unaligned
1 Graverobbing
2 Harass

Action Modifier (3 cards)
3 Conditioning

Reaction (8 cards)
5 Deflection
3 Wake with Evening's Freshness

Combat (45 cards)
4 Disarm
9 Immortal Grapple
4 Increased Strength
5 Taste of Vitae
6 Thrown Sewer Lid
7 Torn Signpost
10 Undead Strength

Ally (1 cards)
1 Leonardo, Mortician

(edited for legibility)

Re: 'Report' of Utrecht

Posted: 01 Mar 2004, 13:38
by hardyrange
Tobias wrote:I think you're all wonderfull people, but you know that anyway. ;)
Right, we do. 8)
Tobias wrote:Round 1:

Me -> Arvid (Lasombra political) -> Emiliano (Gangrel wall) -> Hardy (Giovanni powerbleed) -> X1 (Anson Masterdeck)

(It helped that the Giovanni power-bleed, that had become my predator after ousting Anson & his protected resourced with ease, didn't cycle into bleed modifiers for a few turns. If he had, the table would've probably been his.)
A Power Bleed Deck turning into a Power Only Deck. 8)

I would have liked to find out if I could have ousted Tobias, of course. I would have lasted one turn longer if I had not forgotten to take 1 pool for the Edge earlier in the game, and made a mistake in deciding which vamp to block when Emiliano came to oust me... and I had thze long-awaited bleed mofifier in my hand...

But that is a clear case of what Martin so elegantly calls "Hätterättertätätä". :wink:
Tobias wrote:Table 2:

Me -> Dieter (!Malk/AR) -> X2 (Giovanni powerbleed) -> X3 (Giovanni powerbleed)
Lucky me - I did not share atable with those other two Giovanni players, who used almost the same deck idea (and vampires) as I did - would have been a nasty contesting...
Tobias wrote:(28 player tournament, IIRC).
26, actually.
Tobias wrote:Me -> Wouter (presence anarch vote) -> Luc (Ravnos) -> X6 (Tzimi wall/Fiendish) -> Jochem (Aus/Cel block with guns)
X6 = Martin Schumacher, from the Bochum group.
Tobias wrote:The interesting question to me, at this point (and the whole reason for the long post), is: what has this done to my reputation? The tzimi I screwed in Round 3 I had not played against before, so he'll be wary of me - and he'll inform others about me. The tzimi I screwed in the final was a German lad I hadn't played against before (sorry for the name thing, again), and he'd be right to take tales of my evilness back to his playgroup as well.
You are doing this yourself by posting here, you bad boy... :nono: :wink:
Tobias wrote:No hard feelings, I hope? (The Germans must have a different picture of me than the Belgians and the Dutch folk do. The Belgians and Dutch folk know I got absolute crap results from 2000 to 2003 in all tournaments - however, in 2003, things got better - and I started travelling to germany for the first time around that time).
I will let Martin answer that himself, of course...
Tobias wrote:Anyway, it was very much to play with everyone again, as always. I'll rub Dietmar's belly again for luck the next time I see him. Hope to be coming over to Germany soon, and hope to be organising a tournament again soon.
And it was great beieng in Utrecht (first time for me) - everything my guys had told me turned out true... 8)
We will be beack - promised!
And I hope to see you for the EC Qualifier / German Championship in April!

Re: 'Report' of Utrecht

Posted: 01 Mar 2004, 14:03
by Tobias
hardyrange wrote:
Tobias wrote:Round 1:

Me -> Arvid (Lasombra political) -> Emiliano (Gangrel wall) -> Hardy (Giovanni powerbleed) -> X1 (Anson Masterdeck)

(It helped that the Giovanni power-bleed, that had become my predator after ousting Anson & his protected resourced with ease, didn't cycle into bleed modifiers for a few turns. If he had, the table would've probably been his.)
A Power Bleed Deck turning into a Power Only Deck. 8)

I would have liked to find out if I could have ousted Tobias, of course. I would have lasted one turn longer if I had not forgotten to take 1 pool for the Edge earlier in the game, and made a mistake in deciding which vamp to block when Emiliano came to oust me... and I had thze long-awaited bleed mofifier in my hand...
You probably would have, I think, although I did have wake/deflect, as you saw.
But that is a clear case of what Martin so elegantly calls "Hätterättertätätä". :wink:
Tobias wrote:Table 2:

Me -> Dieter (!Malk/AR) -> X2 (Giovanni powerbleed) -> X3 (Giovanni powerbleed)
Lucky me - I did not share atable with those other two Giovanni players, who used almost the same deck idea (and vampires) as I did - would have been a nasty contesting...
Tobias wrote:(28 player tournament, IIRC).
26, actually.
Ahh.. that explains all those 4-player tables
Tobias wrote:Me -> Wouter (presence anarch vote) -> Luc (Ravnos) -> X6 (Tzimi wall/Fiendish) -> Jochem (Aus/Cel block with guns)
X6 = Martin Schumacher, from the Bochum group.
Thanks. I thought it was Martin, but decided it would be better to admit not being sure. :)
Tobias wrote:The interesting question to me, at this point (and the whole reason for the long post), is: what has this done to my reputation? The tzimi I screwed in Round 3 I had not played against before, so he'll be wary of me - and he'll inform others about me. The tzimi I screwed in the final was a German lad I hadn't played against before (sorry for the name thing, again), and he'd be right to take tales of my evilness back to his playgroup as well.
You are doing this yourself by posting here, you bad boy... :nono: :wink:
True. Maybe I should've kept the deal... but I don't like leaving something like that out of my grasp... even when there's no likely seating changer coming up, Bad Stuff (TM) can ALWAYS happen.
Tobias wrote:No hard feelings, I hope? (The Germans must have a different picture of me than the Belgians and the Dutch folk do. The Belgians and Dutch folk know I got absolute crap results from 2000 to 2003 in all tournaments - however, in 2003, things got better - and I started travelling to germany for the first time around that time).
I will let Martin answer that himself, of course...
Right.
Tobias wrote:Anyway, it was very much to play with everyone again, as always. I'll rub Dietmar's belly again for luck the next time I see him. Hope to be coming over to Germany soon, and hope to be organising a tournament again soon.
And it was great beieng in Utrecht (first time for me) - everything my guys had told me turned out true... 8)
We will be beack - promised!

And I hope to see you for the EC Qualifier / German Championship in April!
Cool! Till next time...

Posted: 01 Mar 2004, 18:05
by Johannes
Tobais, You seem to become a STW (serial tournament winner) lately. Congratulations from the South of Germany. I guess we have to up some "evil-shit" to get a grip in the german champs.

Posted: 01 Mar 2004, 18:08
by Tobias
Thea Bell wrote:Tobais, You seem to become a STW (serial tournament winner) lately. Congratulations from the South of Germany. I guess we have to up some "evil-shit" to get a grip in the german champs.
Thanks very much - I'm surprised myself. There's a fair bit of luck involved as well, of course. And like everyone, mistakes are made...

Maybe I'll bring my new highlander-style deck to Germany - if it tests well... (60 library cards, only 1 copy of every library card).

:)

Posted: 03 Mar 2004, 08:44
by hardyrange
Ein weiterer Turnierbericht, aus der Newsgroup.

Das "Vote deck/ arika baron" Deck von Tisch 2 war uns Didi.
From: cure (cure@caramail.com)
Subject: report of tournament in utrecht, non officiel/comments/decks, very long
Newsgroups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad
Date: 2004-03-02 01:37:03 PST

This is a small unofficial report of the games I played in the
tournament in Utrecht last Sunday…
Emile, one more good tournament in Utrecht , thank you! I wasn't
really in good condition at the start of the tournament , so I decided
to play a ravnos combat deck that I made in 15 minutes a week before
and tested in one 2 player games.
I know the deck was far from optimum and I won't go to the final
unless I have good deal but I wasn't able to think to much on this
Sunday morning, ans it was the best choice.

As usual, I won't make a report of the final, I wasn't there and I
don't do an accurate report, it is just the vamps on the table and
some comments about decks and what they did during the game. My deck
is also at the end of the post because some guys ask me about it!

Table 1:
Tzimice/ calibean anton(burn during the game) kazimir tailor 1.5VP
Giov. Harb. / unre isabelle egothas 0VP
One equipment deck/ fidus (burn in the 3rd turn) marriot tariq Thomas
0.5VP
Ravnos burn/ tereza vaclav 0.5VP

-I would like to see the complete deck of the one equipment…because it
was the funniest deck I have seen at this tournament! He spend his
time to equip : Thomas got a delivery truck, tariq 2 jacket (a flat
and a leather…. Just a comment : tariq must look funny with 2 jacket
on him and a ablative skin!), later on marriot got a sargon via a
delivery from Thomas and tariq receive a submachine gun also via a
delivery… It is amazing, I can almost make a story out of this deck….
He also place a master which gave pool to almost every one at the
start and later give him the possibility to control a bite.
-The tzimisce deck used fiendish tongue to bleed his prey and block
most of his action.
-I decide to burn the first vampire I can in order to show everybody
who is the master of fight… I place a raven on vaclav as soon as he
was out and block fidus : illusion, drawing, grapple, +2agg,
amaranth…bye bye!!! Later I wait too long to do nothing and I was too
late to get the tzimisces (He finish a 3 pools). I also burn a
tzimisce during the game just too make a point about combat.
-the harbinger got the brinksmanship via los muertos but the shambling
were most of the time blocked by the tzimisce. After a fast start on
his prey he wasn't able to get him and die from the bleed of the
tzimisces…
It was a friendly game but I did to many mistake with my deck.

Table 2:
Vote deck/ arika baron and a third vamp that I forgot to write down…
his best move was a switch place with the venture vote deck to get a
VP but he dies 2 turns after.
Bloodbrother / all the team : jack(who die) marck Truman karl(dead too
at the end) ilse
Venture vote / count Catherine marcus (who diablerize jack and was
bloodhunt) arika (on the table when the other one was out of the game)
A gangrel/ becket Danielle (who block my first raven and send vaclav
in torpor, I burn her the next turn to make the point that you don't
want to block me!
Me with the ravnos burn/tereza and vaclav on the table but a bad hand
with no illusion for 5 turns.

-The vote was KRC hard on the gangrel and after I burn Danielle the
other ventrue vote deck switch place with him to get what he was
thinking a "easy VP".
-the blood brother deck did 5 unholesow as his first 5 actions. With
no intercept around him he got all the time to built his clan and then
start to bleed the vote decks… he manage to get the vote deck after
the death of the gangrel in only 2 turn with a couple of big bleed.
-the ventrue vote took his time, did nothing against his prey, block
one of my bleed but get lucky because I didn't have any combat combo
in my hand. Later he switch place but he needed 3 turns to get the
last 3 pools of the gangrel…
-after I burn Danielle (may be not my best move but he blocked me
first and send vaclav to torpor…I can't stay quiet after this move!)…
he sped the rest of the game to try to survive and amazed everybody
when the ventrue tried during 3 turn without success!!! Good work!
-I wasn't lucky with my hand… vaclav blocked by Danielle at the
beginning and send to torpor was really not good… how can you scare
methusala if you are not able to burn a vamp at the beginning… I got
my revenche but it wasn't my best move burn arika one turn after
instead could have been better….. My mistake. Also, I die form bleed
at one and a last force of will by the blood brother.


at this point, I had 20 minutes left from this round + 30 minutes
break...
We did a fast fun game on a 5 table.
A really non serious games with lost of fun , isn't it tobias ?!
me with a ian/agaitas deck, arvid with a lassombra vote, a weenie
dominate necro, a wall raptor, tobias with a standart tremere and anti
We didn't finish this game but we laugh a lot.


table 3:
master deck/ anson huitzilopochtli , they came back 3 times on the
table after being goconda or burn!
Arhimanes / siaese Cynthia and 1 other
Laz deck/ lazverus peter ingid
Me/ Vaclav tereza
After a couple of turn it was clear to everybody that we have to kill
the master deck otherwise he will get the table. I deal with laz a
common peace agreement. The arhimanes still try to get laz with some
bleed at 2 and army of rats but when two anarch revolt were on the
table and a first life boon for 10 was play he decide to help us too.
The master deck got before the end of the time no more crypte, 6
storage, 4 anson minion tap and golconda or burn and 3 huit too.
I did a mistake when he move the milicent in front of me and not in
the middle of my card and block a rush of tereza with a smile on his
face…you forgot the milicent…
"conn.."(French bad word).
I hate this sort of move…. I just wanted to punch him at the time, but
it was my mistake,
At the end, he got the table with one card in hand!.


It was a nice Sunday, And I still didn't fully errecover from my week
end.


If some of the guys against who I played want to post there deck it
will be nice!

My deck :
4 vaclav for pot ANI CHI +1inter vs gangrel 6
4 Tereza Rostas ani aus pot CHI FOR 8
4 Ivan Krenyenko obf ANI CHI FOR POT +1strg get equ 10
I will add one tereza and vaclav more. You just need one tereza and
one vaclav on the table to play.

Retainer & Ally
6 raven spy
10 Reaction
6 force awakening
6 draba
I can remove 1 or 2 draba
40 Combat
7 immortal
9 illusion kindred
6 drawing out of the beast
7 burning wraith
6 amaranth
4 Mayaparisatya
4 amria
I will change the amria for something else. One immortal and burning
less is ok too
Action
6 bum's rush
4 harras
Equipment
3 sport bike
Master
3 haven uncovered
2 HG
1 the PATH OF PARADOX
4 blood doll
3 smiling
3 jake
2 DI
I will remove the DI and the HG

This deck need something else thansmiling to kill his prey but what
???

Posted: 08 Mar 2004, 10:45
by hardyrange
From: Emile Bosman (ebos14@hotmail.com)
Subject: Tournament Report Path of Evil Revelation Utrecht [official]
Newsgroups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad
Date: 2004-03-07 11:13:34 PST

26 methuselahs showed up for another very succesful tournament here in
Utrecht
For Jeff here are the specifics of the tournament

Event Name: Path of Evil revelation Utrecht
Event Date (DD-MON-YY): 02-29-2004
Coordinator: Emile Bosman
City: Utrecht
Format (Constructed/Limited): Constructed
Number of Players: 26
Number of Rounds (including final): 4
Number of Event Matches: 19
Number of New Members: 2
Number of Warnings Issued: 0
Number of Disqualifications: 0
Multi-Judge System Used? NO
Head Judge: Emile Bosman
Assistant Judges: None

As usual I'll only report on the finals but the table seatings for the
tournament were as followed.
Round 1

1 Stefan Kramer 1 1
2 Eli Bosteels 1 1
3 Michael Bartsch 1
4 Sander de Goeij 1
5 Wouter Kuyper 1 3 GW

6 Gerhard Range 2 1
7 Robert Kamphuysen 2
8 Tobias op den Brouw 2 1
9 Arvid Waldrich 2
10 Emiliano Imeroni 2 3 GW

11 Ruben Cauwenberg 3
12 Dietmar Range 3 4 GW
13 Dieter Ahrweiler 3
14 Paul Wiggers 3

15 Fabien Cure 4 0.5
16 Martin Schumacher 4 1.5
17 Jeroen van oort 4
18 Dijonisio garsia Weyzig 4 0.5

19 Mark Brummel 5
20 Luk De Ron 5 4 GW
21 Mark Huyser 5
22 Izaak Avelaar 5

23 Manuel Nieman 6 1
24 Bart Lagsher 6
25 Peter Bouwman 6 1
26 Jochem van Dijk 6 2 GW

Round 2
18 Dijonisio garsia Weyzig 1 0.5
11 Ruben Cauwenberg 1 0.5
24 Bart Lagsher 1 0.5
21 Mark Huyser 1 0.5
1 Stefan Kramer 1 0.5

10 Emiliano Imeroni 2
15 Fabien Cure 2
12 Dietmar Range 2 1
25 Peter Bouwman 2 2
22 Izaak Avelaar 2 2

13 Dieter Ahrweiler 3
23 Manuel Nieman 3 3 GW
2 Eli Bosteels 3
8 Tobias op den Brouw 3 1

14 Paul Wiggers 4
6 Gerhard Range 4
4 Sander de Goeij 4 1
16 Martin Schumacher 4 3 GW

7 Robert Kamphuysen 5
5 Wouter Kuyper 5 4 GW
19 Mark Brummel 5
17 Jeroen van oort 5

20 Luk De Ron 6 1
9 Arvid Waldrich 6
26 Jochem van Dijk 6 2 GW
3 Michael Bartsch 6 1

Round 3
26 Jochem van Dijk 1 2
19 Mark Brummel 1
9 Arvid Waldrich 1 2
13 Dieter Ahrweiler 1
16 Martin Schumacher 1 1

2 Eli Bosteels 2
17 Jeroen van oort 2
23 Manuel Nieman 2
20 Luk De Ron 2
14 Paul Wiggers 2 5 GW

25 Peter Bouwman 3 0.5
3 Michael Bartsch 3
11 Ruben Cauwenberg 3 2.5 GW
10 Emiliano Imeroni 3

5 Wouter Kuyper 4
18 Dijonisio garsia Weyzig 4 1
6 Gerhard Range 4 3 GW
12 Dietmar Range 4

21 Mark Huyser 5
4 Sander de Goeij 5
15 Fabien Cure 5
7 Robert Kamphuysen 5 4 GW

22 Izaak Avelaar 6
8 Tobias op den Brouw 6 4 GW
1 Stefan Kramer 6
24 Bart Lagsher 6

The finals went as followed.
8 Tobias op den Brouw Weenie Potence with Dominate
5 Wouter Kuyper Aabt & Jost Anarch Deck
20 Luk De Ron Ravnos bleed with Red Hering
16 Martin Schumacher Tzimisce Wall bleed deck
26 Jochem van Dijk Torreador gun Wall deck

For some odd reason Wouter chose Tobias as his predator, Tobias
playing a weenie potence deck with some Dominate in it.
Which gave Wouter a lot of trouble during the entire finals having his
vampires torporized constantly luckely for Wouter he had an Aranthebis
in play which none of Tobias his minions could remove it looked like
Tobias was going to have a lot of problems ousting Wouter.
Jochem who was playing a Torreador disguised weapon wall deck ran into
trouble early with his Helena being empty'd in one combat by Martin's
Tzimisce Carion Crows Aid from Bats combat.
The only two players who were able to put presure on they're prey's
were Luk and Tobias.
Tobias had to make a deal with some one to have his vampire remove the
Aranthebes to alow him to oust his prey.
The deal was made with Martin who was at the point of being ousted by
Luk's Ravnos deck.
The deal was that Martin would remove the Aranthebes and place a Haven
Uncovered on one of Luk's minions Tobias would then rush most of his
minions giving Martin a chance to oust Jochem.
And as Martin learned the hard way you should never ever trust a Dutch
bold guy Tobias ousted Wouter and let Luk oust Martin.
Jochem and Tobias made a deal to allow Tobias ousting Luk and then
jochem could conceit making him second in the tournament.
The latter actually happened with Tobias keeping his word and winning
yet another tournament here in Holland.
And this is his winning deck.

[Gewinner-Deck snipped von Hardy]

I would like to thank all the attending players for yet another very
succesful tournament and I'm looking forward to the next one.

Emile
"We are an ape with a symbiotic relationship to a mushroom"

Re: 'Report' of Utrecht

Posted: 09 Mar 2004, 09:41
by hardyrange
Tobias wrote:
hardyrange wrote:
Tobias wrote:No hard feelings, I hope? (The Germans must have a different picture of me than the Belgians and the Dutch folk do. The Belgians and Dutch folk know I got absolute crap results from 2000 to 2003 in all tournaments - however, in 2003, things got better - and I started travelling to germany for the first time around that time).
I will let Martin answer that himself, of course...
Right.
Tobias, Martin told me some days ago that he tried to post a reply here, but his computer fucked up after he had typed in about one page of comments to your question - and did not have the nerve to write the whole thing down again.
But I guess he isn't too mad at you, and you will sort that thing out easily next time... :party:

Re: 'Report' of Utrecht

Posted: 09 Mar 2004, 13:13
by Tobias
hardyrange wrote:
Tobias wrote:
hardyrange wrote: I will let Martin answer that himself, of course...
Right.
Tobias, Martin told me some days ago that he tried to post a reply here, but his computer fucked up after he had typed in about one page of comments to your question - and did not have the nerve to write the whole thing down again.
But I guess he isn't too mad at you, and you will sort that thing out easily next time... :party:
Computers SUCK. But then again, this is why I make some of my money. :)

Thanks for relaying Martin's comments to me. If he still wants to send some, that's fine, if he doesn't - I'll buy him that beer, next time.

Heck, it's my tournament (the next one, if everything works), so you don't have to feed me drunk to get me to play badly, you need to feed me drunk to bribe me. :)

Re: 'Report' of Utrecht

Posted: 09 Mar 2004, 13:36
by hardyrange
Tobias wrote:Heck, it's my tournament (the next one, if everything works), so you don't have to feed me drunk to get me to play badly, you need to feed me drunk to bribe me. :)
What? When? Where? :)

Re: 'Report' of Utrecht

Posted: 09 Mar 2004, 14:33
by Tobias
hardyrange wrote:
Tobias wrote:Heck, it's my tournament (the next one, if everything works), so you don't have to feed me drunk to get me to play badly, you need to feed me drunk to bribe me. :)
What? When? Where? :)
Don't worry, I'll let you know.

My old location was damaged due to fire (or, to be more accurate, water-damaged due to putting out a fire), and re-built by a business that does not rent it out anymore.

As soon as I have my new location up and running, the next tournament will happen. And I've got several feelers out...